35 Chesswood Road
Tel 01903 230066
Should spinal manipulation for treating neck pain be abandoned?
The English team believes that SMT can cause a VBA, that the risk of it happening outweighs the potential benefits, and that the procedure should be abandoned. However, their Canadian colleagues disagree saying that it is a valuable addition to patient care and that abandoning this type of treatment will harm the patients.
Chiropractic is the profession most well known for using SMT but it is also used by other professions, some more skilled than others. Looking objectively at all of the available evidence neck manipulation has been shown to be a safe and effective way of providing relief from neck pains and headaches. The latest larger review of recent research was published in 2010 and it is available here in PDF format.
This VBA debate has gone on for years and various scientific articles have pointed in opposite directions but it is particularly British researchers who appear determined to discredit SMT. The argument is whether the estimated 1 in 1,350,000 (yes, 1.35 million) risk of suffering a stroke from a vertebral artery dissection is worth it. For one practitioner manipulating 20 necks every weekday that is one occurrence every 260 years(!) and as you can read below some research suggests that SMT is unlikely cause the stroke.
In response to the debate the British Chiropractic Association published the following:
' A debate has been published in the British Medical Journal (8 June 2012), questioning the safety of neck manipulation. Neck manipulation has been shown to be safe and effective and benefits thousands of people suffering from neck pain and headaches. In fact, the risk of a stroke after treatment is the same http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18204390 whether you see a GP and get a prescription or see a chiropractor and get your neck adjusted. Manipulation of the neck is at least as effective as other medical treatments and is safer than many of the drugs used to treat similar conditions. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17258728
The term chiropractic is often mis-
In one report of 24 cases attributed to chiropractors, not one was shown to be a chiropractor http://chiromt.com/content/14/1/16#B21.
Chiropractors are highly trained in spinal care. In one UK study undertaken in 2007, of 50,000 neck treatments reviewed, not one single adverse event was reported. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17906581
If you have any concerns about your treatment, please discuss this with your chiropractor ' .
The third study I think speaks for itself and one would hope that the researchers simply made a mistake.
I was involved in supplying data for the 2007 study, which was a large well-
Current evidence suggests that spinal manipulation provided as a standalone therapy has no statistical benefit over standalone exercise therapy. However, at Park View Acupuncture and Chiropractic Clinic we do not use SMT as our only approach. We combine it with various muscle and soft tissue massage and stretching techniques, with mobilisation, exercises and home care advice. If we feel that SMT is inappropriate or if any of our patients prefer not to use SMT we simply choose other techniques more suitable to the patient in front of us, young or old.
We appreciate that it is difficult to sift through medical literature to choose a worthwhile therapy especially when, at times, even the researchers cannot make up their minds. Ask friends and family for recommendations, and share your personal experiences to benefit others. However, always make sure that the person you choose is qualified to do the job and is a member of a relevant professional body.
We aim to deliver evidence based, effective treatment -
As the BCA suggests feel free to call me on 01903 230066 or email me if you have any concerns or queries.
See also:: Chiropractic neck manipulation is safe
Jan Olsen DC
Park View Acupuncture and Chiropractic Clinic